CALIFORNIA CANNABIS LEASES
Leasing property for cannabis operations in California presents a unique and complex set of challenges, primarily stemming from the ongoing conflict between state-level legalization and federal prohibition. This dichotomy means that standard commercial leases are inadequate, requiring specialized provisions to mitigate significant risks for both landlords and tenants. Experienced legal counsel can assist in drafting a lease that mitigates those risks.
Federal-State Legal Discrepancy
Despite recreational and medicinal cannabis being legal in California, it remains a Schedule I controlled substance under federal law. This core conflict creates several critical issues:
Mortgage Defaults: Standard mortgage agreements often contain clauses requiring compliance with “all laws,” including federal ones. Landlords risk their lenders “calling” the loan, demanding immediate repayment of the entire mortgage, if they lease to a cannabis business.
Civil Asset Forfeiture: Landlords could potentially face civil asset forfeiture, where property used for federally illegal activities is seized by federal authorities.
Contractual “Unlawful Purpose” Lease Clauses: Standard lease forms (like A.I.R. or C.A.R. forms) often state the premises cannot be used for any “unlawful” purpose. This can give a landlord grounds to evict a cannabis tenant at any time due to federal illegality, unless the lease is specifically drafted to disallow this interpretation.
Key Considerations for Landlords and Tenants
To navigate these challenges, cannabis leases in California must be highly customized and address specific operational and legal realities.
Strict Compliance and Licensing: Landlords can reduce risk by mandating strict adherence to all state and local cannabis laws, licensing, and permit requirements. Both parties should ensure the property’s zoning allows for the specific cannabis activity (e.g., cultivation, distribution, retail) before signing any agreement, with the lease clearly stating the intended use to satisfy licensing authorities.
Insurance: Securing insurance for cannabis-related properties can be difficult and expensive. Some insurers refuse coverage altogether. Landlords should seek cannabis-friendly insurance brokers and, typically, structure the lease as a triple net (NNN) lease, passing all insurance and tax costs onto the tenant.
Banking: Due to federal banking restrictions, cannabis businesses primarily operate in cash, which presents security and payment challenges that should be addressed in the lease.
Access and Security: California’s security protocols under MAUCRSA are rigorous and restrict access to the premises. Leases must be carefully drafted to allow landlord access for maintenance and inspections without violating the tenant’s security compliance and potentially jeopardizing their license.
Termination and Indemnity: Lease agreements should include termination provisions that address cannabis-specific risks, such as changes in federal law, enforcement actions, or license revocation. Robust indemnity clauses are also critical, protecting the landlord from tenant-related legal issues.
Market Landscape
The legal cannabis industry in California has faced stagnation and declining sales in recent years, with a significant illicit market still operating. This difficult market requires landlords to be particularly diligent in vetting potential tenants’ business viability and licensing status.
Ultimately, given the unique legal and financial entanglements, both landlords and tenants in the California cannabis space are strongly advised to seek expert legal counsel experienced in this niche field to draft a comprehensive and protective lease agreement.
Contact us by phone or email to learn more about California government law including California cannabis law, state, county or city cannabis licensing and cannabis regulations, regulatory compliance, litigation, and hemp laws.