Hemp and the 2018 Farm Bill

Hemp and the 2018 Farm Bill

[Updates at end of article.]

The 2018 Farm Bill (the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018) enacted by the US Congress opened the hemp industry for business.  There are, however, misperceptions and confusion as to what the 2018 Farm Bill does.  The 2018 Farm Bill established the direction of farm and food policy for five years through 2023.  The Farm Bill addresses a variety of policies and programs but the biggest news was the treatment of hemp.

Hemp Background

Both marijuana and hemp are from the same species of plant, Cannabis sativa, but from different varieties or cultivars.  Hemp is a low THC variety of cannabis, legally defined as less than 0.3 percent THC (2018 Farm Bill section 10113).  Hemp is used in a number of products such as paper, fabrics, food and beverages, nutrition products, construction materials, and other industrial goods.  Hemp is also used for extraction of CBD (Cannabidiol).  Due to US restrictions on hemp production, however, the estimated $700 million annual retail hemp product sales in the US are significantly dependent on imports.

Prior to the late 1950s, hemp in the United States was considered an agricultural commodity, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) supported its production.  Control and regulation of hemp has been administered by the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) since the late 1950s.  The definitions of marijuana under the 1937 Marihuana Tax Act and the 1970 Controlled Substances Act (CSA) do not distinguish between low THC cannabis plants (hemp) and high THC cannabis plants – both were considered Schedule I controlled substances.  Some argued that the definition under the Controlled Substances Act exempts industrial hemp under its exclusions for stalks, fiber, oil, cake, and seeds, but the DEA has consistently disagreed with this position.

Federal policy regarding hemp was significantly altered with the 2014 Farm Bill (Agricultural Act of 2014).  The 2014 Farm Bill allowed state departments of agriculture to grow hemp under an agricultural pilot program, and certain research institutions, in states with laws allowing for hemp production.  Further, the US Congress used appropriations bills to block the US Department of Agriculture from prohibiting the transportation, processing, sale, or use of industrial hemp that is grown or cultivated in accordance with the 2014 Farm Bill, and also blocked the DEA and other federal law enforcement authorities from interfering with state agencies, hemp growers, and agricultural research.  

Nevertheless, there was significant disagreement concerning certain aspects of the 2014 Farm Bill including the definition of industrial hemp, who could cultivate hemp, the scope of the commercial activity allowed, the transportation and sale of hemp across state lines, and the importation of viable hemp seeds.  (See 2016 Congressional correspondence regarding hemp to USDA, DEA & FDA and the CRS Memo with 2016 Joint DEA, USDA & FDA Statement of Principles on Industrial Hemp.)

2018 Farm Bill

The 2018 Farm Bill establishes a new federal hemp regulatory system under the US Department of Agriculture which aims to facilitate the commercial cultivation, processing, and marketing of hemp, and essentially treat hemp like any another agricultural commodity.  It removes hemp and hemp seeds from the statutory definition of marijuana and the DEA schedule of Controlled Substances (that removal was effective upon the enactment of the 2018 Farm Bill in December 2018).  It even makes hemp an eligible crop under the federal crop insurance program.  The 2018 Farm Bill also allows the transfer of hemp and hemp-derived products across state lines provided the hemp was lawfully produced under a State or Indian Tribal plan or under a license issued under the USDA plan. 

This does not mean, however, that anyone can start growing hemp. Hemp cultivation and production will remain subject to significant regulation at the federal, state and local levels.  Under the 2018 Farm Bill, each state (or Indian tribe, territory or possession) department of agriculture must submit to the USDA a plan for state licensing and regulation of hemp. 

The USDA is currently working on its federal hemp cultivation regulations and expects to have them in place Fall of 2019.  Then it will begin to approve state programs.  The goal is to have regulatory programs in place for the 2020 planting season.  Until then, any current hemp farming will have to operate under the more restrictive 2014 Farm Bill. That 2014 Farm Bill legal authority expires 12 months after the USDA has established the plan and regulations required under the 2018 Farm Bill. [**Update 10/1/20 – The United States Congress extended that expiration to September 30, 2021 – see section 122 of HR 8337.]

The 2018 Farm Bill also outlines actions that are considered violations of federal hemp law including activities such as cultivating without a license or producing cannabis with more than 0.3 percent THC.  It sets forth possible punishments for violations and identifies which activities qualify as felonies.

Finally, the 2018 Farm Bill does not affect or modify the authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services or the Commissioner of Food and Drugs to regulate hemp under applicable US Food and Drug Administration laws.  (See the 2019 Hemp Legal Opinion by USDA General Counsel.)

State Hemp Regulations

The 2018 Farm Bill applies to all states and Indian tribes (as well as the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any other territory or possession of the United States).  A state, territory, or Indian tribal government hemp regulatory plan must be approved by the USDA before that hemp plan can take effect.  For any state, territory, or Indian tribal government that does not submit a hemp regulatory program, the USDA will create a regulatory program for hemp cultivators in that jurisdiction to apply for licenses.

States and Indian tribes retain authority to prohibit or restrict cultivation of hemp if they choose but cannot prohibit the interstate transportation of hemp lawfully produced. (There are conflicting cases on whether States or Indian tribes can prohibit interstate transportation of hemp lawfully produced under the prior 2014 Farm Bill. The USDA General Counsel has issued an opinion that they may not prohibit interstate transportation.)

Section 297B of the 2018 Farm Bill sets out certain provisions that must be included in every state hemp regulatory plan:

i.) a practice to maintain relevant information regarding land on which hemp is produced in the State or territory of the Indian tribe, including a legal description of the land, for a period of not less than 3 calendar years;

ii.) a procedure for testing, using postdecarboxylation or other similarly reliable methods, delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration levels of hemp produced in the State or territory of the Indian tribe;

iii.) a procedure for the effective disposal of: plants, whether growing or not, that are produced in violation of this subtitle; and products derived from those plants;

iv.) a procedure to comply with the enforcement procedures under subsection (e) of the Farm Bill;

v.) a procedure for conducting annual inspections of, at a minimum, a random sample of hemp producers to verify that hemp is not produced in violation of this subtitle;

vi.) a procedure for submitting the information described in section 297C(d)(2) of the Farm Bill to the Secretary not more than 30 days after the date on which the information is received; and

vii.) a certification that the state or Indian tribe has the resources and personnel to carry out the practices and procedures described in clauses (i) through (vi) of the Farm Bill.

The coming months will be busy for the USDA as well as state and local jurisdictions as they develop their hemp regulatory systems.  We are tracking the development of federal hemp regulations as well as California state and local (county & city) hemp regulations and laws. 

**Update 10/29/19: The USDA today announced the establishment of the U.S. Domestic Hemp Production Program and released its awaited draft hemp rule (USDA Hemp Rule) which will be published in the Federal Register allowing hemp to be grown under federally approved plans and making hemp producers eligible for a number of agricultural programs. The USDA hemp rule includes provisions to approve hemp production plans developed by states and Indian tribes. The USDA also developed guidelines for hemp testing (USDA Hemp Testing Guidelines) and sampling (USDA Hemp Sampling Guidelines) that are being issued concurrently with this rule.

**Update 1/16/21: The USDA published its final hemp rule on January 15, 2021, providing a definitive regulatory framework for hemp production throughout the United States. The regulations take effect March 22, 2021. See the USDA Final Hemp Rule.

Contact us to learn more about hemp licensing and regulation.

California Cannabis Law Update

California Legislature Marijuana & Cannabis Law

State Legislature Makes Changes to California Cannabis Law – Legislative Update

As the California State Legislature implored the Federal Government to urge the United States Department of Justice not to direct its enforcement priorities towards California’s lawfully and closely regulated cannabis industry (AJR 27), urged the Federal Government to allow financial institutions to provide services to the cannabis industry (AJR 28), and requested Congress to reschedule cannabis from a Schedule 1 drug on the Federal Controlled Substances Act (SJR 5), the California State Legislature also considered over 50 pieces of marijuana legislation during its first full term session after the approval of the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act of 2016 (AUMA), Proposition 64 on November 8, 2016 and the subsequent approval of Senate Bill 94, the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) on June 27, 2017.

Read more about changes to California Cannabis Law with the complete 2018 California Cannabis Law Legislative Update.

Decriminalization of both medical and adult-use cannabis was initiated by the California voters.  The Compassionate Use Act (Proposition 215) decriminalized medical cannabis in 1996, however, it did not provide any further guidance and/or limitations on State or local regulation of medical cannabis.  Therefore, the State legislature had the authority to establish subsequent marijuana regulation, such as Senate Bill 420 (2003) and the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act of 2016 with a simple majority vote.  Conversely, Proposition 64 expressly requires a 2/3 majority vote to amend adult-use marijuana regulation, unless the legislation is to implement the substantive provisions of AUMA.

The proposed cannabis legislation considered in the 2017-2018 California Legislative Session ranged from simple non-substantive clean-up language such as modifying all references to reflect the name change to the Bureau of Cannabis Control and the consolidation of the licensure and regulation of commercial medicinal cannabis and adult-use cannabis activities (AB 3261) to pre-emption of local regulations prohibiting cannabis delivery services (SB 1302).  In short, the State Legislature sent over 30 new cannabis laws to the Governor’s desk.

Read more about proposed California cannabis legislation with the complete 2018 California Cannabis Law Legislative Update.

Here are some of the more significant pieces of cannabis legislation that went to the California Governor.

Assembly Bill 1793 establishes a pro-active role in the recall, dismissal and/or a redesignation of a criminal cannabis conviction of an offense for which a lesser offense or no offense could be imposed under AUMA (update 9/30/18 this bill has now been signed by the Governor).  Under current law, an individual may petition for a recall, dismissal and/or a redesignation of the offense (see Marijuana Conviction Resentencing Under California Prop 64).  Under the proposed law, the Department of Justice, before July 1, 2019, is mandated to review the state summary criminal history information database and identify the past convictions that are eligible for recall, dismissal and/or redesignation.  The process requires notification to the prosecution of eligibility and mandates review by the prosecution no later than July 1, 2020.  The prosecution must notify the public defender and court if it intends to challenge the recall, dismissal and/or redesignation.  The prosecution is required to notify the court if it does not intend to challenge.  If no challenge is filed by the prosecutor by July 1, 2020, the court is required to reduce or dismiss the conviction.

Assembly Bill 2020, which required a 2/3 vote in the Legislature, would expand the opportunity for California temporary cannabis event licenses to any venue expressly approved by a local jurisdiction (update 9/26/18 this bill has now been signed by the Governor).  The legislation proposes regulation similar to other regulations adopted for other commercial cannabis businesses, mandates that all participants in the temporary cannabis event engaged in retail sales be licensed to engage in that activity, and that the application be filed 60 days in advance of the cannabis event.

Assembly Bill 3112 (effective July 1, 2019) prohibits the sale of nonodorized butane in any quantity to any person other than  manufacturers, wholesalers, resellers, or retailers solely for the purpose of resale or volatile solvent extraction activity licensed under Division 10 (commencing with Section 26000) of the Business and Professions Code, with the exemption of lighters and small containers to refill lighters.  The bill authorizes civil penalties and civil enforcement actions for violation of this provision.

Senate Bill 1127 would enact Jojo’s Act authorizing California school districts, county boards of education, and charter schools maintaining kindergarten or any grades 1 to 12 to adopt a policy to permit a parent or guardian to possess and administer cannabis to a student who is a qualified patient under the Compassionate Use Act, excluding smokeable or vapeable form, at a school site.  This is not an issue under AUMA as it relates to individuals under the age of 21 for medical cannabis use only.  (Update 9/28/18 this bill has now been vetoed by the Governor.)

California State Senator Jerry Hill drafted the bill in honor of Jojo, who suffers from Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.  Pursuant to a medical recommendation, Jojo injests a chemical cannabidiol (CBD) with a trace amount of THC, to control his severe seizure disorder.  His mother arrives at his school every day at noon to administer the dosage but cannot do it on the school campus.

This week, a California State Administrative Law Judge ruled that Brooke Adams, age 5, could continue to attend kindergarten at a public school.  Brooke has Duvet Syndrome, a rare genetic brain dysfunction.  The Judge’s ruling permits a nurse to accompany Brooke to school to administer the medically recommended cannabis-based medication she needs when she has an unpredictable seizure.

Some of the other significant topics addressed by the California Legislature included: AB 106 investigation of criminal history of cannabis license applicants; AB 710 cannabidiol; AB 873 Department of Food and Agriculture commercial cannabis activity inspectors; AB 1527 Cannabis Control Appeals Panel;  AB 1741 cannabis taxation and electronic funds transfer; AB 1793 cannabis convictions and resentencing; AB 1863 personal income tax deduction for commercial cannabis activity; AB 1996 the California Cannabis Research Program; AB 2020 local jurisdiction cannabis temporary event license; AB 2058 driving under the influence of cannabis; AB 2164 local ordinances, fines and penalties for cannabis; AB 2215 veterinarians and administration of cannabis to animals; AB 2255 cannabis distribution and deliveries; AB 2402 protection of personal information of cannabis customers; AB 2721 cannabis testing laboratories; AB 2799 adult-use cannabis and medicinal cannabis license applications and OSHA training; AB 2899 cannabis: advertisements; AB 2914 cannabis in alcoholic beverages; AB 2980 cannabis premises common space; AB 3067 internet and marketing of cannabis to minors; AB 3069  cannabis informational, educational, or training events; AB 3112 controlled substances and butane; AB 3261 nonsubstantive cannabis regulation changes; AJR 27 joint resolution urging the United States Department of Justice not to direct its enforcement priorities towards California’s lawfully and closely regulated cannabis industry; AJR 28  joint resolution urging the Congress and the President to pass legislation that would allow financial institutions to provide services to the cannabis industry; SB 65 ingesting marijuana while driving or riding in a vehicle; SB 311 commercial cannabis distributors; SB 829 cannabis donations to a medical cannabis patient; SB 872 local government taxation re groceries; SB 1127 pupil health and administration of medicinal cannabis at schoolsites; SB 1294 cannabis state and local equity programs; SB 1409 industrial hemp; SB 1451 licenses and cannabis sale to underaged persons; SB 1459 cannabis provisional license; SJR 5 Federal rescheduling of marijuana from a Schedule I drug.

A more comprehensive description of all the cannabis bills considered by the State Legislature, approved and not approved, is available at the 2018 California Cannabis Law Legislative Update.

To learn more about about cannabis law in California, go to California Cannabis Law.

Contact us to learn more about California state or local cannabis regulations, cannabis regulatory compliance, and cannabis litigation.